On the methods employed to record and measure the human soleus H-reflex

ISSN： 1369-1651

Source： Somatosensory & Motor Research, Vol.23, Iss.1-2, 2006-03, pp. : 55-62

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate if the magnitude of the soleus H-reflex is different depending on the method employed to measure its size (peak-to-peak amplitude vs. area). In this study, 13 healthy human subjects participated, while the soleus H-reflex was induced via conventional methods. In the first experiment, the soleus H-reflex was recorded via two monopolar electrodes and was evoked at least at eight different stimulation intensities in respect to the recovery curve of the H-reflex and at three different inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) (8, 5, and 2s). The ISI refers to the time delay between the single pulses delivered to the posterior tibial nerve within a single trial. In the second experiment, the effects of common peroneal nerve (CPN) stimulation at short (2–4ms) and at long (60–120ms) conditioning test (C-T) intervals on the soleus H-reflex elicited every 5s were established. Control and conditioned reflexes were recorded via a single differential bipolar electrode. In both experiments, H-reflexes were quantified by measuring their size as peak-to-peak amplitude and as area under the full-wave rectified waveform. The reflex responses recorded through two monopolar electrodes across stimulation intensities and ISIs measured as peak-to-peak amplitude had larger values than measured as area. In contrast, the magnitude of the reflexes, conditioned by CPN stimulation at either short or long C-T intervals and recorded via a single differential electrode, were not significantly different when measured as peak-to-peak amplitude or as area. Our findings indicate that monopolar recordings yield different reflex sizes depending on the method employed to measure the reflex size, and that the H-reflex measured as area might detect better the homosynaptic reflex depression. The lack of observing such differences with bipolar recordings might be related to changes of the reflex shape at a given stimulus intensity due to inhibitory inputs. The implications of our findings are discussed in respect to human reflex studies.