Spinal Cord Protection during Aortic Cross Clamping: Retrograde Venous Spinal Cord Perfusion, Distal Aortic Perfusion, and Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage

Author： Winnerkvist Anders Bartoli Stefano Iliopoulos Dimitrios C. Hess Kenneth R. Miller Charles C. Safi Hazim J.

Publisher： Informa Healthcare

ISSN： 1401-7431

Source： Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal, Vol.36, Iss.1, 2002-02, pp. : 6-10

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Objective - We investigated retrograde venous spinal cord perfusion (RVP), with the established adjuncts cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD), and distal aortic perfusion (DAP) in the canine model. We then examined the clinical feasibility of RVP, DAP, and CSFD.Design - Canine study: Twenty dogs were randomized to four treatment groups. All animals underwent 60 min of complete aortic cross-clamp. Group 1 was the control and received only aortic cross-clamp; group 2 DAP and CSFD; group 3 DAP, CSFD, and RVP; and group 4 CSFD plus RVP. Human study: Five patients underwent aortic graft replacement of the descending or thoracoabdominal aorta, while receiving CSFD, DAP, and RVP.Results - Canine study: All animals in groups 1 and 4 awoke paralyzed. One animal each in groups 2 and 3 were paraparetic, with the remaining dogs neurologically intact. Groups 2 and 3 differed from groups 1 and 4 at p < 0.0001. Human study: No mortality or permanent complications were observed in this group.Conclusion - While RVP did not reduce neurologic injury, neither did it increase morbidity. In humans the method is technically feasible and free from major problems. Further animal studies and randomized trials are underway at our center.