

Author: Hagberg K. Häggström E. Brånemark R.
Publisher: Informa Healthcare
ISSN: 1464-5165
Source: Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol.29, Iss.8, 2007-01, pp. : 643-649
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Purpose. Uncomplicated methods for evaluation of prosthetic walking performance for individuals with lower limb amputations are valuable. The Physiological Cost Index (PCI), the comfortable walking speed (CWS) and self-reported walking distances are three examples of such measures. The aim was to obtain values for these measures for individuals walking with transfemoral prostheses and to compare the results with healthy controls. Method. Individuals with an established transfemoral amputation for reasons other than vascular disease (TFA-group, n = 41, 30 male/11 female, mean age 49, SD 11.5) were compared to age-and gender matched healthy controls (Healthy group, n = 22). PCI was assessed walking in CWS for 5 min and self-reported distances accomplished outdoors was assessed with the Walking Habit Score (0 - 100). Results. Mean PCI was 0.55 (SD 0.19) in the TFA-group and 0.31 (SD 0.09) in the Healthy group (p < 0.001). The CWS was 62 (SD 12.6) and 90 (SD 12.8) m/min and the Walking Habit Score 48 (SD 19) and 74 (SD 16) score-points respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions. By using uncomplicated and inexpensive methods, this study shows that walking with transfemoral prostheses is done with considerably increased energy cost, slower CWS and that limited walking distances outdoors are performed compared to healthy controls.
Related content




By Hachisuka Kenji Makino Kenichiro Wada Futoshi Saeki Satoru Yoshimoto Nami
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 39, Iss. 8, 2007-10 ,pp. :




By Lauzière Séléna Miéville Carole Betschart Martina Duclos Cyril Aissaoui Rachid Nadeau Sylvie
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 46, Iss. 9, 2014-10 ,pp. :


Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, Vol. 32, Iss. 2, 2000-06 ,pp. :