

Author: Mansell Jim
Publisher: Informa Healthcare
ISSN: 1469-9532
Source: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, Vol.31, Iss.2, 2006-06, pp. : 65-76
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Background Deinstitutionalisation of services for people with intellectual disabilities has become a focus of disability policy in many countries. Research for the most part supports this strategy. However, outcomes are not uniformly better for everyone who moves to community living. This paper explores reasons for variability in service quality and highlights important lessons for countries starting to modernise services. Method The effects of deinstitutionalisation are summarised and emerging problems identified. The changing context of different welfare‐state models and paradigms in disability and public administration are outlined. Results The main changes which have impacted on the implementation of deinstitutionalisation include: the rise of market‐based approaches to service provision, arrangements for rationing services, the “de‐differentiation” of intellectual disability services, and the rise of a rights‐based model in disability policy. Conclusions The paper sets out priorities for the future development of community services. Success is likely to require a renewed focus on demonstrating improvement in the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities and a change in the role of staff to provide more facilitative, enabling support of individuals, especially those with the most severe or complex disabilities.
Related content


Deinstitutionalisation in England
By Emerson Eric
Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, Vol. 29, Iss. 1, 2004-03 ,pp. :




By Langeland Eva Wahl Astrid Kristoffersen Kjell Nortvedt Monica Hanestad Berit
Community Mental Health Journal, Vol. 43, Iss. 4, 2007-08 ,pp. :


Living With AIDS: Ethical Problems Involving Personhood
Journal of Nursing Law, Vol. 9, Iss. 3, 2004-01 ,pp. :