Fetal biometry: a comparison between experienced sonographers and automated measurements

Author： Zalud Ivica Good Sara Carneiro Gustavo Georgescu Bogdan Aoki Kathleen Green Lorry Shahrestani Farzaneh Okumura Russell

Publisher： Informa Healthcare

ISSN： 1476-4954

Source： Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol.22, Iss.1, 2009-01, pp. : 43-50

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Fetal biometry and fetal weight estimation: JSUM standardization

By Shinozuka N.

The Ultrasound Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Vol. 2, Iss. 3, 2002-09 ,pp. : 156-161

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Growth charts of fetal biometry: a longitudinal study

By Munim Shama Morris Tim Baber Nilofer Ansari Yasmeen Iqbal Azam Syed

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 25, Iss. 6, 2012-06 ,pp. : 692-698

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A comparison between ultrasound and clinical methods for predicting fetal weight

By Zayed F. Abu-Heija A.

Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Vol. 19, Iss. 2, 1999-03 ,pp. : 159-161

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Sonographic estimate of birth weight: relative accuracy of sonographers versus maternal–fetal medicine specialists

By Humphries J. Reynolds D. Bell-Scarbrough L. Lynn N. Scardo J. A. Chauhan S. P.

Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 11, Iss. 2, 2002-02 ,pp. : 108-112

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Within-subject variability of differences between conventional and automated blood pressure measurements in pregnancy

By Koenen S.V. Franx A. Oosting H. Bonsel G.J. Bruinse H.W. Visser G.H.A.

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Vol. 80, Iss. 1, 1998-09 ,pp. : 79-84

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite