Liquid Ice^TM fails to cool the skin surface as effectively as crushed ice in a wet towel

ISSN： 1532-5040

Source： Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, Vol.26, Iss.6, 2010-08, pp. : 393-398

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

One sought to compare surface cooling produced by two cryotherapy modalities (crushed ice in a room temperature wet towel and Liquid Ice^TM). Twenty-five university students (10 female and 15 male) between 19 and 29 years of age (mean±SD: 21.36±2.33) participated in this study. Skin surface temperature was measured prior to, immediately after 20-minute application, and 20-minute postapplication of the cryotherapy modality using an infrared camera. Both cryotherapy modalities decreased the baseline skin surface temperature (crushed ice: 28.6±1.3 to 6.8±1.8°C; Liquid Ice^TM: 28.6±1.6 to 25.2±1.56°C; p<0.001). Similarly, at 20 minutes postapplication of both cryotherapy modalities the skin surface temperature remained significantly inferior to baseline (crushed ice: 21.8±1.0°C; Liquid Ice^TM: 27.4±1.6°C; p<0.001). The magnitude of the decrease was greater after the application of crushed ice in a room temperature wet towel than Liquid Ice^TM, both immediately after application (temperature fall: 21.8±1.6°C versus 3.4±0.7°C; p<0.001) and 20 minutes postapplication (temperature fall: 6.8±0.8°C versus 1.2±0.6°C; p<0.001). Assuming that greater cooling seems to be better, the present results suggest that: 1) a 20-minute application of crushed ice in a room temperature wet towel is more effective at cooling skin temperature than evaporative cooling menthol-based products and 2) Liquid Ice^TM is not a clinically useful modality.