

Author: Banks William A
Publisher: Informa Healthcare
ISSN: 1742-5247
Source: Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, Vol.3, Iss.6, 2006-11, pp. : 707-712
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Peptides hold great potential as CNS drugs, but their delivery to the CNS is problematic. However, actual roadblocks to peptide delivery are different from those often perceived. Many peptides cross the blood–brain barrier by saturable and non-saturable mechanisms, and accumulate in brain in amounts sufficient to produce physiological effects. Peripheral factors (e.g., short half-life in blood) can be dominant factors limiting therapeutic use. Production of therapeutics that are enzymatically resistant and have long circulation times, even when the blood–brain barrier penetration is low, can result in substances with significant CNS accumulation. Surprisingly low amounts of peptide in brain can result in CNS effects, and so the dose needed for brain delivery is generally much smaller than for peripheral tissues. Brain-to-blood transporters can greatly limit CNS accumulation of a potential therapeutic. Finally, intranasal and intrathecal routes may be especially useful for substances that are rapidly degraded in blood or are large and hydrophobic, respectively.
Related content




Targeting anti-HIV drugs to the CNS
By Rao Kavitha S Ghorpade Anuja Labhasetwar Vinod
Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, Vol. 6, Iss. 8, 2009-08 ,pp. :


By Dus Santos M.J. Wigdorovitz A. Trono K. Ros R.D. Franzone P.M. Gil F. Moreno J. Carrillo C. Escribano J.M. Borca M.V.
Vaccine, Vol. 20, Iss. 7, 2002-01 ,pp. :

