

Author: Scott L. Finn A. O’Leary T. McLellan S. Hill J.
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 1460-2350
Source: Human Reproduction, Vol.22, Iss.1, 2007-01, pp. : 230-240
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many different embryo selection criteria have been used in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), but there are no published prospective studies to ascertain their usefulness in predicting implantation. METHODS: In a prospective trial, 20 early scoring parameters previously reported to influence clinical outcome were collected, but embryos were selected for transfer by current laboratory protocols; day 1 pronuclear (PN) (Z) score combined with day 3 or 5 morphology. Data points for each oocyte/embryo were scored independently and tracked individually. Data were analysed retrospectively for parameters most likely to result in a positive pregnancy test, fetal heartbeat (FHB) and delivery. RESULTS: Results indicated that day 1 PN morphology and nucleolar precursor body (NPB) ratio, day 2 cell number, blastomere symmetry and nucleation and the ability to cleave from day 2 to day 3 were the six most significant factors in fetal development. This outcome was then applied prospectively over 8 months. The implantation rate (IR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) increased in each age group, and the number of embryos used decreased. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, early parameters that include PN morphology, number and ratio of NPBs per nucleus and the day 2 morphology of cleaving embryos are stronger positive predictors of implantation than day 3 morphology or the ability to achieve the blastocyst stage of development. Parameters that were most consistently correlated with no delivery were lack of PN symmetry, day 2 multinucleation and uneven cell size. Day 3 and day 5 parameters were not significant compared with the combination of early parameters.
Related content


By Gámiz Pilar Rubio Carmen de los Santos M. José Mercader Amparo Simón Carlos Remohí José Pellicer Antonio
Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, Iss. 11, 2003-11 ,pp. :


By Papanikolaou Evangelos G. Kolibianakis Efstratios M. Tournaye Herman Venetis Christos A Fatemi Human Tarlatzis Basil Devroey Paul
Human Reproduction, Vol. 23, Iss. 1, 2008-01 ,pp. :




By Wathlet S. Adriaenssens T. Segers I. Verheyen G. Van de Velde H. Coucke W. Ron El R. Devroey P. Smitz J.
Human Reproduction, Vol. 26, Iss. 5, 2011-05 ,pp. :


By Papanikolaou Evangelos G. D’haeseleer Elke Verheyen Greta Van de Velde Hilde Camus Michael Van Steirteghem Andre Devroey Paul Tournaye Herman
Human Reproduction, Vol. 20, Iss. 11, 2005-11 ,pp. :