Interactionism and the Non-Obviousness of Scientific Theories: a Response To Michael P. Levine

Publisher： Brill

ISSN： 1570-0682

Source： Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, Vol.10, Iss.1, 1998-01, pp. : 61-77

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Response to Michael Rea

Scottish Journal of Theology, Vol. 68, Iss. 1, 2015-01 ,pp. : 80-82

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Epistemic Criterion: A Response to Michael Hand

By Cooling Trevor

Journal of Beliefs and Values, Vol. 35, Iss. 1, 2014-01 ,pp. : 86-89

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Syncretism, historicism, and cognition: A response to Michael Pye1

By Martin Luther H.

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, Vol. 8, Iss. 2, 1996-01 ,pp. : 215-224

Brill

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Distinctions, Differentiations, Ontology, and Non-humans in Theories of Religion

By Stausberg Michael

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, Vol. 22, Iss. 4, 2010-01 ,pp. : 354-374

Brill

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Lee I. LEVINE, Caesarea under Roman Rule (Studies in Judaism in Late Antiquity, vol. VI), E. J. Brill, Leiden 1975, XV and 297 p., cloth f 80,_

Journal for the Study of Judaism, Vol. 6, Iss. 2, 1975-01 ,pp. : 212-213

Brill

Access to resources Recommend Favorite