

Author: Saar Martin
Publisher: Brill
ISSN: 1872-2636
Source: Journal of the Philosophy of History, Vol.2, Iss.3, 2008-09, pp. : 295-314
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The aim of this article is to clarify the relation between genealogy and history and to suggest a methodological reading of Nietzsche's Genealogy of Morals. I try to determine genealogy's specific range of objects, specific mode of explication, and specific textual form. Genealogies in general can be thought of as drastic narratives of the emergence and transformations of forms of subjectivity related to power, told with the intention to induce doubt and self-reflection in exactly those readers whose (collective) history is narrated. The main interest in understanding the concept of genealogy and revisiting Nietzsche's introduction of it into philosophy lies in understanding how a certain way of writing and a certain textual practice function that successfully call into question current judgments, institutions and practices. Nietzsche's example, I argue, can provide a paradigm for a critical practice that accounts for historical processes of subject formation in terms of power and turns them against given forms of subjectivity.
Related content


History of science and the historian's self-understanding
By Prudovsky G.
The Journal of Value Inquiry, Vol. 31, Iss. 1, 1997-03 ,pp. :


Foucault at Work: Archaeology, Genealogy, and the Dispositions of Power
By White Daniel
The European Legacy, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, 2009-06 ,pp. :


Is Agency a Power of Self-Movement?
Inquiry, Vol. 56, Iss. 6, 2013-12 ,pp. :


By Krupp Tyler
Journal of the Philosophy of History, Vol. 2, Iss. 3, 2008-09 ,pp. :


By Bevir Mark
Journal of the Philosophy of History, Vol. 2, Iss. 3, 2008-09 ,pp. :