

Author: Hämäläinen R.
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 0926-2644
Source: Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol.10, Iss.4, 2001-07, pp. : 331-353
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
In this paper we describe a framework for multicriteria modeling and support of multi-stakeholder decision processes. We report on its testing in the development of a new water level management policy for a regulated lake-river system in Finland. In the framework the stakeholders are involved in the decision process from the problem structuring stage to the group consensus seeking stage followed by a stage of seeking public acceptance for the policy. The framework aims at creating an evolutionary learning process. In this paper we also focus on the use of a new interactive method for finding and identifying Pareto-optimal alternatives. Role playing experiments with students are used to test the practical applicability of a negotiation support procedure called the method of improving directions. We also describe the preference programming approach for the aggregation of the stakeholder opinions in the final evaluation of alternatives and consensus seeking.
Related content






A Power Game of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives
The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Vol. 2014, Iss. 55, 2014-09 ,pp. :

