

Author: Siemer William
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1087-1209
Source: Human Dimensions of Wildlife, Vol.14, Iss.3, 2009-05, pp. : 185-197
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Problematic human-black bear interactions have increased in North America. Research is needed to clarify influences on human concern about and reaction to bear behavior, such that wildlife managers can better understand and maintain stakeholder acceptance capacity for bears. This article uses mail survey data (n = 1,038, response rate = 42%) and structural equation modeling (SEM) to test a conceptual model of factors affecting concern about bears and predisposition to contact authorities for assistance. Findings support hypotheses that both variables are influenced by wildlife value orientation, personal experience with bears, and television viewing. Use of print media is not a predictor of concern or behavioral predisposition, leading to rejection of those hypotheses. Strong wildlife benefits beliefs and neutral personal experience with bear presence attenuate concern, while exposure to television has the opposite effect. Findings suggest that improving measures of personal experience and basic beliefs will strengthen models of bear-related concern.
Related content


Introduction to Special Section on Human-Black Bear Interactions
By Miller Craig
Human Dimensions of Wildlife, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, 2009-05 ,pp. :


Factors Influencing Risk Perception Associated with Human-Black Bear Conflict
Human Dimensions of Wildlife, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, 2007-03 ,pp. :



