

Author: Muster W.
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 1464-3804
Source: Mutagenesis, Vol.18, Iss.4, 2003-07, pp. : 321-329
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
In recent years genotoxicity testing has become more and more important in the process of early screening for potential development compounds. In the case that a pharmacologically interesting structure is found to be positive in an in vitro mutagenicity test a straightforward approach starts by sorting out what substructure is responsible for the activity observed in the test. The Ames test is a rapid, convenient test system which has been effectively used in structure–activity relationship studies for mutagenicity, since it can rapidly establish differences in the mutagenic action of isomers and chemical analogs. The lead compound with a benzodiazepine-like structure and close analogs exhibited weak, but unequivocal positive effects in the Ames test (strains TA1535 and TA 100) after metabolic activation by rat liver homogenate fraction (S9). To identify substances within this class of compounds devoid of mutagenic liability an extensive structure–activity investigation was undertaken. More than 50 compounds were tested in the two critical bacterial strains, using a standard plate incorporation and a preincubation modification. It quickly became evident that the benzodiazepine structure was not involved. First hints that the allyl side chain were responsible for the Ames activity had to be refined in a more complex, but clear-cut structure–activity relationship during the course of the experiments. It was shown that all compounds with an allyl side chain, independent of the heterocycle, but surprisingly also all compounds with a specific arrangement of the heteroatoms in the oxadiazole ring, showed positive effects in at least one strain. Based on these investigations it was possible to select pharmacologically active structures without mutagenic liability.
Related content


By Lokwani Deepak Bhandari Shashikant Pujari Radha Shastri Padma shelke Ganesh Pawar Vidya
Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry, Vol. 26, Iss. 3, 2011-06 ,pp. :


By Rahman M. Mamunur Ichiyanagi Takashi Komiyama Tadazumi Hatano Yoshihiko Konishi Tetsuya
Free Radical Research, Vol. 40, Iss. 9, 2006-09 ,pp. :


By Haveliwala Dhaval D. Kamdar Nimesh R. Mistry Prashant T. Patel Saurabh K.
Nucleosides, Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids, Vol. 33, Iss. 2, 2014-02 ,pp. :


By Senthil Raja Duraisamy Bhuvanesh Nattamai Natarajan Karuppannan
JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 17, Iss. 2, 2012-02 ,pp. :