

Author: Froyn Camilla
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 1567-9764
Source: International Environmental Agreements, Vol.4, Iss.3, 2004-09, pp. : 279-302
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Over 10 years ago the EU Commission proposed a directive on carbon taxes, but faced so much domestic resistance that agreement was not reached until last year – and after it had been considerably watered down. The aim of this paper is to look into economic reasons for the political infeasibility of extensive carbon taxes. Since opposition is believed to arise prior to the policy implementation, the cost estimates have a myopic character compared with market estimates, in the sense that sectors are presumed to take into account their own substitution opportunities, but disregard changes in other sectors as well as the macroeconomic welfare gains from a tax regime. With this myopic approach, we estimate and compare costs of emissions cuts across sectors and across countries in the EU, showing how different sectors might have anticipated the impacts from an expected carbon tax. This focus illustrates that what seems to be cost-effective and to the best for the region on paper turned out too controversial to be politically feasible.
Related content




Carbon Taxation in the EU: Expanding the EU Carbon Price
Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 24, Iss. 2, 2012-07 ,pp. :






IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 6, Iss. 17, 2009-02 ,pp. :