Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: In vitro examination of 8 designs

By Bengs Benjamin   Sangiorgio Sophia   Ebramzadeh Edward  

Acta Orthopaedica, Vol. 79, Iss. 6, 2008-12 ,pp. : 755-762

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter

By Kluess Daniel   Zietz Carmen   Lindner Tobias   Mittelmeier Wolfram   Schmitz Klaus-Peter   Bader Rainer  

Acta Orthopaedica, Vol. 79, Iss. 6, 2008-12 ,pp. : 748-754

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Are leg length and hip offset comparable after hip resurfacing and cementless total hip arthroplasty?

By Patel S   Thakrar RR   Bhamra J   Hossain F   Tengrootenhuysen M   Haddad FS  

Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Vol. 93, Iss. 6, 2011-09 ,pp. : 465-469

The Royal College of Surgeons of England

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty with 28 and 32-mm femoral head

By Amlie Einar   Høvik Øystein   Reikerås Olav  

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Vol. 11, Iss. 2, 2010-06 ,pp. : 111-115

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Adverse reaction to metal debris after ReCap-M2A-Magnum large-diameter-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty

By Mokka Jari   Junnila Mika   Seppänen Matti   Virolainen Petri   Pölönen Tuukka   Vahlberg Tero   Mattila Kimmo   Tuominen Esa K J   Rantakokko Juho   Äärimaa Ville   Kukkonen Juha   Mäkelä Keijo T  

Acta Orthopaedica, Vol. 84, Iss. 6, 2013-12 ,pp. : 549-554

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite