The Politician and the Judge: Accountability in Government

Author: Maskin Eric   Tirole Jean  

Publisher: American Economic Association

ISSN: 0002-8282

Source: The American Economic Review, Vol.94, Iss.4, 2004-09, pp. : 1034-1054

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

We build a simple model to capture the major virtues and drawbacks of making public officials accountable (i. e., subjecting them to reelection): On the one hand, accountability allows the public to screen and discipline their officials; on the other, it may induce those officials to pander to public opinion and put too little weight on minority welfare. We study when decision-making powers should be allocated to the public directly (direct democracy), to accountable officials (called "politicians"), or to nonaccountable officials (called "judges").