Timing of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis: Evidence to Support a Proposal for an Early Interval Surgery

Author： Low Jee K. Barrow Paul Owera Anas Ammori Basil J.

Publisher： Southeastern Surgical Congress

ISSN： 0003-1348

Source： The American Surgeon, Vol.73, Iss.11, 2007-11, pp. : 1188-1192

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

We evaluated the safety and feasibility of delayed urgent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) performed beyond 72 hours to overcome the logistical difficulties in performing early urgent LC within 72 hours of admission with acute cholecystitis (AC), and to avoid earlier readmission with recurrent AC in patients awaiting delayed interval. Patients admitted with AC were scheduled for urgent LC. Patients who underwent early urgent LC were compared with those who had delayed urgent surgery. Fifty consecutive patients underwent urgent LC for AC within 2 weeks of admission. There were no conversions and no bile duct injuries. Delayed surgery (n = 36) neither prolonged operating time (90 vs 85 minutes), nor increased operative morbidity (9.7% vs 7.7%) or mortality (2.4% vs 7.7%) compared with early surgery (n = 14). Although delayed surgery was associated with shorter postoperative hospital stay (1 vs 2 days, P = 0.029), it prolonged total hospital stay (9 vs 5 days, P < 0.0001). Delay of LC beyond 72 hours neither increases operative difficulty nor prolongs recovery. It might be more cost effective to schedule patients who could not undergo early urgent LC but are responding to conservative treatment for an early interval LC within 2 weeks of presentation with AC.