Author: LAURA HALL AMY
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 0360-5310
Source: The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Vol.31, Iss.3, 2006-07, pp. : 285-304
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The barrier to global health most often noted in Western discourse is the enduring disparity of access to medical technologies. This assessment of the circumstances in global health fits well within a bioethic centered on the equitable distribution of access to medical goods. Yet through an interrogative consideration of two episodes in the marketing of progress, namely the Century of Progress Exposition in Chicago (1933–1934) and one post-war spin on atomic development in the National Geographic, I suggest that the language of medical advancement continues to trade on a division between civilized, rational, scientifically developed peoples and the atavism of peoples by whom Western science gauges its progress. I recommend unremittingly self-critical attention to the dynamics of language and legitimization used within the Western academy by those who seek ostensibly to be of use in regions (powerfully) labeled as “developing.”
Related content
Responsibility for Global Health
By Buchanan Allen DeCamp Matthew
Theoretical Medicine, Vol. 27, Iss. 1, 2006-01 ,pp. :
Global Health and Foreign Policy
By Feldbaum Harley Lee Kelley Michaud Joshua
Epidemiologic Reviews, Vol. 32, Iss. 1, 2010-04 ,pp. :
Epidemiologic Approaches to Global Health
By Quinn Thomas C. Samet Jonathan M.
Epidemiologic Reviews, Vol. 32, Iss. 1, 2010-04 ,pp. :