The Nirvana Fallacy and the Return of Results

ISSN： 1536-0075

Source： American Journal of Bioethics, Vol.13, Iss.2, 2013-02, pp. : 43-44

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Return of “Accurate” and “Actionable” Results: Yes!

By Knoppers Bartha Maria Laberge Claude

American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 9, Iss. 6-7, 2009-06 ,pp. : 107-109

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Parents' Preferences for Return of Results in Pediatric Genomic Research

Public Health Genomics, Vol. 17, Iss. 2, 2014-03 ,pp. : 105-114

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Public Expectations for Return of Results—Time to Stop Being Paternalistic?

By Fernandez Conrad

American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 8, Iss. 11, 2008-11 ,pp. : 46-48

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Beneficence, Clinical Urgency, and the Return of Individual Research Results to Relatives

By Fullerton Stephanie M. Trinidad Susan Brown Jarvik Gail P. Burke Wylie

American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 12, Iss. 10, 2012-10 ,pp. : 9-10

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Public Expectations for Return of Results from Large-Cohort Genetic Research

By Murphy Juli Scott Joan Kaufman David Geller Gail LeRoy Lisa Hudson Kathy

American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 8, Iss. 11, 2008-11 ,pp. : 36-43

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite