To invade or not to invade: two approaches to a prokaryotic predatory life cycle

Author: Ward Caitlin   Pechey Andrea   Koval Susan F.  

Publisher: NRC Research Press

ISSN: 1480-3275

Source: Canadian Journal of Microbiology, Vol.59, Iss.4, 2013-02, pp. : 273-279

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Bdellovibrio and like organisms (BALOs) are a group of Gram-negative bacterial predators that are defined as having a periplasmic life cycle, whereby the predator enters into the periplasm of a prey cell. Recently, a predator of Caulobacter crescentus with a novel epibiotic life cycle was identified as a new species — Bdellovibrio exovorus. Therefore, this raises the question as to what determines the type of life cycle of a predator. Six bacterial strains susceptible to predation by B. exovorus JSS were isolated from soil, sewage, and activated sludge. 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis revealed these prey cells to be Acinetobacter johnsonii, Acinetobacter junii, Aeromonas hydrophila, and Delftia acidovorans. The life cycle of B. exovorus was epibiotic on all these prey cells. Environmental samples were enriched with these prey cells; new BALOs were isolated and their life cycle assessed. All new isolates had a periplasmic life cycle. BALOs generally have diverse prey ranges, and thus, not all new prey cells could be used by each new predator. Overall, each prey cell was able to support the growth of predators with either life cycle. Therefore it was confirmed that it is the predator and not the prey that determines the type of life cycle.