Modeling ground vibration response functions for rail transit with finite element analysis

By Glickman Gary M.   Nelson James T.   Carman Richard A.  

INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2010, Iss. 9, 2010-06 ,pp. : 2194-2203

Institute of Noise Control Engineering

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

COMPARISON AND MODELING OF THE ADSORPTION OF TWO MICROCYSTIN ANALOGUES ONTO POWDERED ACTIVATED CARBON

By Cook D.  

Environmental Technology, Vol. 29, Iss. 5, 2008-05 ,pp. : 525-534

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of two methods of mathematical modeling in hydrodynamic sealing gap

By  

EPJ Web of Conference, Vol. 92, Iss. issue, 2015-05 ,pp. : 02040-02040

Edp Sciences

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison of two excitation methods for determining "feelable" dynamic response in buildings

By Napier James C.  

INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1974, Iss. 1, 1974-09 ,pp. : 645-648

Institute of Noise Control Engineering

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A comparison of flash flood response at two different watersheds in Grenada, Caribbean Islands

By  

IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 29, Iss. 1, 2016-01 ,pp. : 23-30

IOP Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite