Is there a benefit to adding rituximab to CHOP in the overall survival of patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in a developing country?

Author: Ruiz-Delgado Guillermo J   Gómez-Almaguer David   Tarín-Arzaga Luz C   Cantú-Rodriguez Olga G   Urdaneta Carlos Alarcón   Rodríguez-Morales Uxmal   Calderón-Garcia Jackeline   Fernández-Vargas Omar   Montes-Montiel Maryel   Sánchez-Cárdenas Mónica   Ruiz-Argüelles Guillermo J  

Publisher: Maney Publishing

ISSN: 1024-5332

Source: Hematology, Vol.17, Iss.4, 2012-07, pp. : 193-197

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Rituximab (R) has changed the prognosis of patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) in developed countries, but its role has not been analyzed in underprivileged circumstances. One hundred and two patients with NHL treated in a developing country were analyzed: 28 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) and 74 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLCL). Patients were treated upfront with either cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or R-CHOP; the decision to employ R depending solely on the ability of patients to defray it. In DLCL, 42 were given CHOP and 32 R-CHOP, whereas in FL, 19 were given CHOP and 9 R-CHOP. The impact of the addition of R was found to be clearer in FL than in DLCL. In patients with DLCL, the overall survival (OS) was 87% at 80 months for those treated with R-CHOP and 84% at 145 months for those treated with CHOP (not significant). In patients with FL, the OS was 89% at 88 months for those treated with R-CHOP and 71% at 92 months for those treated with CHOP (P = 0.05). In a multivariate analysis, other variables which were identified to be associated with the OS were IPI and number of cycles in DLCL. It is concluded that R produced a mild positive impact in the OS of patients with FL, but not in those with DLCL. Since the addition of R results in a 36-fold increase in treatment costs, these observations may be important to decide therapeutic approaches in NHL patients living in underprivileged circumstances.

Related content