Author： Alford Helen
Publisher： Emerald Group Publishing Ltd
ISSN： 0262-1711
Source： The Journal of Management Development, Vol.29, Iss.7-8, 2010-01, pp. : 697-705
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Purpose - Current mainstream management theory is based on incomplete assumptions regarding the nature of human beings and human action, leading to damaging practical results. This paper aims to draw on personalism for the formulation of better assumptions for theory. Design/methodology/approach - The main problems in current assumptions are analysed. A combination of the exclusion of human intentionality with a view of human beings as self-interest maximisers who betray relationships if it is in their interest so to do, leads to practical proposals for management that distort human behaviour and tend to make people less trustworthy. Nevertheless, such assumptions are not entirely wrong; it is their incompleteness that is problematic. They need to be able to include the intrinsically relational aspect of the human being. In personalism, the human being is seen as a duality, individual-person, which can provide a way of conceiving both the self-interested and self-giving aspects of human action in an integrated way. Findings - Three brief examples of how these expanded assumptions can give us better guidance in management situations indicate the further potential of this line of research. Personalism grounds human dignity in the idea of the person as the
Related content
Practical wisdom and the Rule of Benedict
The Journal of Management Development, Vol. 29, Iss. 7-8, 2010-01 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
Practical wisdom and understanding the economy
The Journal of Management Development, Vol. 29, Iss. 7-8, 2010-01 ,pp. :
Spiritual capital and practical wisdom
The Journal of Management Development, Vol. 29, Iss. 7-8, 2010-01 ,pp. :
Transforming healthcare: a study in practical wisdom
The Journal of Management Development, Vol. 29, Iss. 7-8, 2010-01 ,pp. :