Superintendent perspectives and practice of accountability, democratic voice and social justice

Author： Alsbury Thomas L. Whitaker Kathryn S.

ISSN： 0957-8234

Source： Journal of Educational Administration, Vol.45, Iss.2, 2007-03, pp. : 154-174

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to report on the superintendent portion of the UCEA Voices III project. Design/methodology/approach - A four-year study to determine how school leaders, from several locations and contexts, describe their perceptions of and experiences with educational leadership related to the study themes, school improvement, democratic community, and social justice. Findings - Study findings indicate that superintendents articulated these study themes in more general and practical terms than found in the academic literature, and share a belief that the themes may be mutually exclusive, and require contextual interpretation to be functional. The paper concludes by calling for extending our ideas of how to practice social justice, solicit broader community voice, employ shared decision making, and measure accountability. Originality/value - Authors recommend that practitioners place more emphasis on individualized contextual and cultural realities that can minimize or even counter the intended effects of these leadership approaches in practice. Conclusions suggest that superintendents understand and practice a more inclusive form of social justice, sometimes having to control and filter majority stakeholder inputs to achieve more ethical, socially just, educational decisions. The study provides a critical and needed empirical evaluation of the theoretical concepts of shared decision-making, inclusion of community stakeholders, and practicing social justice. As superintendents attempt to practice these concepts in a real-world context, they have discovered and provided insights into the limitations of these ideas.