

Author: Wickramasinghe Dharmasri Wickramasinghe Vathsala
Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd
ISSN: 1741-038X
Source: Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol.23, Iss.2, 2012-02, pp. : 157-177
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the moderating effect of perceived organisational support (POS) on the relationship between participation in decision making (PDM) and affective commitment, and PDM and job satisfaction in lean production in Sri Lanka. Design/methodology/approach - A random sample of 616 shop-floor employees engaged full-time in export-apparel manufacturing firms, which have implemented a formal lean production system in the whole manufacturing function and where lean production has become the standard of operation for at least one year in Sri Lanka, responded. Regression analysis was used to test hypotheses. Findings - It was found that POS moderates the relationship between PDM and affective commitment, and PDM and job satisfaction. Originality/value - The literature suggests that the bottom-line changes often cited in lean implementation success stories, such as reduced inventories and faster flow times, are not the only results that should be considered. The potential detrimental effects on employees should be considered as well, or turnover and morale problems may sabotage the effectiveness of such implementations. However, the manner in which the lean production environment influences employee behaviour has received scant empirical attention. The findings of this study provide interesting implications to practice and will be a source of general guidance in stimulating future research in this area.
Related content


By Rodrigues Ana Paula Pinho José Carlos M.R.
Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 4, Iss. 2, 2010-01 ,pp. :




By Halepota Jamshed A. Shah Naimatullah
Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, Vol. 5, Iss. 3, 2011-08 ,pp. :

