

Author: Sirdeshmukh D. Subhadra K.
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 0022-2461
Source: Journal of Materials Science, Vol.40, Iss.7, 2005-04, pp. : 1553-1570
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Several methods are available for the determination of the bulk modulus of solids and single crystal elastic constants. Although high accuracy is claimed, cases exist where the values of the elastic properties reported by different workers using different or same methods show differences far beyond the claimed limits of experimental errors. More than two dozen cases are cited where the differences in the reported values of the bulk moduli are of the order of 20% or more; in some cases the differences are as much as a factor of 3–5. Similarly, nearly a dozen cases are cited where the single crystal elastic constants of a crystal from different sources differ by about 20% or more and in some cases by a factor of 3–15; in fact there are cases where the reported elastic constants even differ in sign. This paper discusses a number of consistency checks for elastic properties of solids which help in sifting acceptable values from out of a wide range of reported values.
Related content


Elastic properties of degraded polypropylene
By Navarro R. d’Almeida J. Rabello M.
Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 42, Iss. 6, 2007-03 ,pp. :


Elastic properties of lanthanum aluminosilicate glasses
Materials Research Bulletin, Vol. 39, Iss. 1, 2004-01 ,pp. :




Elastic properties of compacted metal powders
Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 33, Iss. 18, 1998-09 ,pp. :


Elastic properties of polycrystalline elemental sulphur
By Scafé E. Nardella A. Filippis D.
Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 40, Iss. 14, 2005-07 ,pp. :