An Evaluation of Malingering Screens with Competency to Stand Trial Patients: A Known-Groups Comparison

Author： Vitacco Michael Rogers Richard Gabel Jason Munizza Janice

ISSN： 0147-7307

Source： Law and Human Behavior, Vol.31, Iss.3, 2007-06, pp. : 249-260

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Detection of Cognitive Malingering or Suboptimal Effort in Defendants Undergoing Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations

By Paradis Cheryl M.

Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, Vol. 13, Iss. 3, 2013-05 ,pp. : 245-265

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Forensic Applications of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (MFAST): Screening for Feigned Disorders in Competency to Stand Trial Evaluations

By Jackson Rebecca Rogers Richard Sewell Kenneth

Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 29, Iss. 2, 2005-04 ,pp. : 199-210

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The creation and development of an instrument to determine fitness to stand trial

By Oosthuizen H. Calitz F. Verschoor T.

Forensic Science International, Vol. 73, Iss. 3, 1995-06 ,pp. : 203-209

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Do Defense Attorney Referrals for Competence to Stand Trial Evaluations Depend on Whether the Client Speaks English or Spanish?

By Varela Jorge

Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 35, Iss. 6, 2011-12 ,pp. : 501-511

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comparison and Evaluation: Lessons from Enrichment Law

By Plessis Jacques du

Rabels Zeitschrift fuer auslaendisches und internationales Privatrecht, Vol. 76, Iss. 4, 2012-10 ,pp. : 947-966

Mohr Siebeck

Access to resources Recommend Favorite