

Author: Van Wijk Dolf Thompson Roy S. De Rooij Christ Garny Veronique Lecloux André Kanne Reinhard
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 0167-6369
Source: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol.97, Iss.1-3, 2004-10, pp. : 69-86
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
This risk assessment on monochlorobenzene was carried out for the marine environment, following methodology given in the EU risk assessment Regulation (1488/94) and Guidance Document of the EU New and Existing Substances Regulation (TGD, 1996). Data from analytical monitoring programmes in large rivers and estuaries in the North Sea area were collected and evaluated for effects and environmental concentrations. Risk is indicated by the ratio of predicted environmental concentration (PEC) to predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) for the marine aquatic environment. In total, 27 data for fish, 24 data for invertebrates and 13 data for algae were evaluated. Acute and chronic toxicity studies were taken into account and appropriate assessment factors used to define a final PNEC value of 32 μg/l. Recent monitoring data indicate that monochlorobenzene levels in surface waters are below determination limits of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5 μg/l used in monitoring programs. Assuming that half of the lowest determination (0.1 μg/l) is typical, a PEC of 0.05 μg/l was derived. A worst case of 0.5 μg/l is assumed. PEC/PNEC ratios give safety factors of 60 to over 500, taking no account of dilution in the sea. Monochlorobenzene is not a `toxic, persistent and liable to bioaccumulate' substance sensu the Oslo and Paris Conventions for the Prevention of Marine Pollution (OSPAR-DYNAMEC) criteria. Environmental fate and effects data indicate that current use of monochlorobenzene poses no unacceptable risk to the aquatic environment.
Related content








By De Rooij Christ Defourny Christine Thompson Roy S. Garny Veronique Lecloux André Van Wijk Dolf
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 97, Iss. 1-3, 2004-10 ,pp. :