A theoretical analysis of secondary structural characteristics of anticancer peptides

Author： Dennison Sarah Harris Frederick Bhatt Tailap Singh Jaipaul Phoenix David

ISSN： 0300-8177

Source： Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Vol.333, Iss.1-2, 2010-01, pp. : 129-135

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Here, cluster analysis showed that a database of 158 anticancer peptides formed 21 clusters based on net positive charge, hydrophobicity and amphiphilicity. In general, these clusters showed similar median toxicities (P = 0.176) against eukaryotic cell lines and no single combination of these properties was found optimal for efficacy. The database contained 14 peptides, which showed selectivity for tumour cell lines only (ACP_CT), 123 peptides with general toxicity to eukaryotic cells (ACP_GT) and 21 inactive peptides (ACP_I). Hydrophobic arc size analysis showed that there was no significant difference across the datasets although peptides with wide hydrophobic arcs (>270°) appeared to be associated with decreased toxicity. Extended hydrophobic moment plot analysis predicted that over 50% of ACP_CT and ACP_GT peptides would be surface active, which led to the suggestion that amphiphilicity is a key driver of the membrane interactions for these peptides but probably plays a role in their efficacy rather than their selectivity. This analysis also predicted that only 14% of ACP_CT peptides compared to 45% of ACP_GT peptides were candidates for tilted peptide formation, which led to the suggestion that the absence of this structure may support cancer cell selectivity. However, these analyses predicted that ACP_I peptides, which possess no anticancer activity, would also form surface active and tilted α-helices, clearly showing that other factors are involved in determining the efficacy and selectivity of ACPs.