Author: Schöbel Enrico
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 0929-1261
Source: European Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.19, Iss.2, 2005-04, pp. : 207-211
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
In a final inquiry at the end of the Conference on Editorial Policies the three editors, Bruno S. Frey (“Kyklos”), Manfred J. Holler (“Homo oeconomicus”), and Jürgen G. Backhaus (“European Journal of Law and Economics”), were asked to comment on their editorial policies. They answered by explaining the challenges they were or still are confronted with, which strategies they have already developed to go on and of course what they have learnt from the deliberations at this conference. In their statements they referred to their preceding paper presentations, and the contributions by Wolfgang Bergsdorf, who is the chief editor of “Die Politische Meinung”, and Peter Senn.
Related content
Law in the European Union: The role of the advocate general
Journal of Legislative Studies, Vol. 10, Iss. 1, 2004-0 ,pp. :
GENERAL CLAUSES AND THE COMPETING ETHICS OF EUROPEAN CONSUMER LAW IN THE UK
Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 71, Iss. 2, 2012-06 ,pp. :
Moreana, Vol. 47 (Number 181-182), Iss. 3-4, 2010-12 ,pp. :