Author: Adnett Nick Hardy Stephen
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 0929-1261
Source: European Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.23, Iss.1, 2007-02, pp. : 29-41
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The Lisbon Strategy commits the EU to making labour market regulation more employment friendly with commentators anticipating some resulting convergence on the US model. Surprisingly, part of this post-Lisbon convergence has taken the form of a major extension of EU Social Policy with the expansion of anti-discrimination policies to address the case of age discrimination. We argue that unlike the US experience, it is the current preoccupation with raising European employment rates that has led to this expansion of ‘hard law’ Social Europe. We are unable to provide an efficiency rationale for this extension and assess alternative explanations. We also provide arguments suggesting that its impact is likely to differ from those experienced in the US.
Related content
The development of the European social Union in ECJ case-law
ERA Forum, Vol. 9, Iss. 1, 2008-04 ,pp. :
Age discrimination: employers' questions
Industrial Relations Law Bulletin, Vol. 795, Iss. 1, 2006-11 ,pp. :
Industrial Relations Law Bulletin, Vol. 787, Iss. 1, 2006-07 ,pp. :
Industrial Relations Law Bulletin, Vol. 784, Iss. 1, 2006-05 ,pp. :
Industrial Relations Law Bulletin, Vol. 786, Iss. 1, 2006-06 ,pp. :