Author: Sharpe Andrew
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 0957-8536
Source: Law and Critique, Vol.18, Iss.2, 2007-07, pp. : 207-228
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
This article will argue that the legal idea of the monster offers to inform contemporary thinking in relation to outsiders. Drawing on the work of Foucault it will be contended that the process, whereby at least some human beings are positioned as outsiders, is structured like a monster. That is to say, at least some constructions or representations of human difference, both legal and non-legal, are informed by the monster category. The article will think through and unpack Foucault’s the idea of the monster, and his sufficient and necessary conditions of monster production. In the process, the article will identify two contemporary figures that bear the legacy of this legal category. These are the figures of Foucault’s abnormal individual and the human/animal hybrid of genetic medicine, figures that can neither be reduced to products of law or disentangled from its domain. An emphasis on the importance of the template of the monster in understanding these contemporary figures points to its relevance to legal scholarship within fields such as gender, sexuality and race, and bioethics respectively.
Related content
Legal Limits on the Structured Settlement of Damages
Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 52, Iss. 3, 1993-09 ,pp. :
THE CATEGORY “LEGAL THEOLOGY” AND THE STUDY OF CHRISTIAN LAWS
Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 32, Iss. 1, 2017-03 ,pp. :