

Author: Hartsock N. Mueller T. Karathanasis A. Cornelius P.
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 1385-2256
Source: Precision Agriculture, Vol.6, Iss.1, 2005-02, pp. : 53-72
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Utilizing soil electrical conductivity (EC) measurements and terrain attributes for precision management will require secondary soil information for adequate interpretation. The objective of this study was to determine whether readily available second-order soil surveys were of adequate quality to aid with interpreting soil EC and terrain data. For three locations in Kentucky, USA, first-order soil surveys were created, second-order surveys reports were obtained, elevation was measured and used to calculate terrain attributes (slope, aspect, plan curvature, profile curvature), and bulk soil electrical conductivity was measured. Three analytical methods (an ordinary least squares analysis and two random field analyses), visual map assessment, and examination of least-squares means were used to assess the relationships between soil EC measurements, terrain attributes and first- and second-order soil surveys. The OLS and random field analyses were problematic. However, the ranking of the OLS
Related content










By Pettersson Carl-Göran Söderström Mats Eckersten Henrik
Precision Agriculture, Vol. 7, Iss. 5, 2006-10 ,pp. :