Disability discrimination: Chain of causation not broken by second wrongful act

By  

Industrial Relations Law Bulletin, Vol. 755, Iss. 1, 2005-02 ,pp. : 17-18

Industrial Relations Services

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Disability discrimination: Where legislation requires protective clothing to be worn but an employee cannot comply due to disability, and where alternative clothing or employment is not available, their dismissal will not be discriminatory, the EAT holds. (p.15)

By  

Industrial Relations Law Bulletin, Vol. 736, Iss. 1, 2004-05 ,pp. : 15-16

Industrial Relations Services

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Disability discrimination: The Court of Appeal holds that clear medical evidence of a disability is required in "deduced effect" cases for a claimant to show that he or she is disabled within the meaning of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995. (p.2)

By  

Industrial Relations Law Bulletin, Vol. 712, Iss. 1, 2003-05 ,pp. : 2-3

Industrial Relations Services

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Sex Discrimination: Pro rata reduction of bonus not discriminatory

By  

Industrial Relations Law Bulletin, Vol. 786, Iss. 1, 2006-06 ,pp. : 17-17

Industrial Relations Services

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Disability discrimination: An individual suffering from urinary incontinence as a result of surgery conducted as a standard treatment for prostate cancer is disabled for the purposes of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, the Court of Appeal holds. (p.8)

By  

Industrial Relations Law Bulletin, Vol. 716, Iss. 1, 2003-07 ,pp. : 8-9

Industrial Relations Services

Access to resources Recommend Favorite