Author: Chen AM Leff DR Simpson J Chadwick SJD McDonald PJ
Publisher: The Royal College of Surgeons of England
ISSN: 1478-7083
Source: Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Vol.88, Iss.5, 2006-09, pp. : 482-485
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: To compare the variations in consenting practice amongst trainees and consultant surgeons for laparoscopic cholecystectomy with specific reference to the documentation of significant risks of surgery.PATIENTS AND METHODS: A proforma was devised which included significant and/or commonly recognised complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This was then cross-referenced with the consent forms for the 80 patients included in the study and the documented risks explained in each case were noted.RESULTS: The results showed that there is considerable variation between the three grades of clinicians involved in obtaining a patient's consent for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There was a clear difference in emphasis of the significant complications depending on the seniority of the consenter. Over 80% of the consents in this study were still being obtained by junior staff.CONCLUSIONS: More often than not, patients are not provided with consistent information to make an informed choice. We suggest that a preprinted consent form will provide a more uniform approach to consenting practice for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Related content
Is Cirrhosis a Contraindication to Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy?
The American Surgeon, Vol. 81, Iss. 1, 2015-01 ,pp. :