Learning issues raised by the educational peer review of significant event analyses in general practice

Author： Bowie Paul   McCoy Steven   McKay John   Lough Murray  

Publisher： Radcliffe Press

ISSN： 1479-1064

Source： Quality in Primary Care, Vol.13, Iss.2, 2005-06, pp. : 75-84

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Barriers to significant event analysis: an attitudinal survey of principals in general practice

By McKay John   Bowie Paul   Murray Lilian   Lough Murray  

Quality in Primary Care, Vol. 11, Iss. 3, 2003-09 ,pp. : 189-197

Radcliffe Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Significant event review and the new GMS contract: the challenge for work based learning

By Sandars John  

Work Based Learning in Primary Care, Vol. 1, Iss. 2, 2003-06 ,pp. : 119-125

Radcliffe Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The perceptions of educational steering committees on protected learning time in general practice

By Cunningham David   Kelly Diane  

Quality in Primary Care, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, 2007-02 ,pp. : 37-43

Radcliffe Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Factors influencing the submission of videotaped consultations by general practitioners for peer review and educational feedback

By McMillan Rhona   Cameron Niall  

Quality in Primary Care, Vol. 14, Iss. 2, 2006-06 ,pp. : 85-89

Radcliffe Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Accessibility, feasibility and educational impact of a peer review process for general practitioner consultation skills

By McMillan Rhona  

Quality in Primary Care, Vol. 20, Iss. 2, 2012-05 ,pp. : 105-114

Radcliffe Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite