

Author: Uphoff Norman
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 0022-0388
Source: Journal of Development Studies, Vol.43, Iss.1, 2007-01, pp. : 218-236
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Contemporary debates on whether or not transgenic innovations will be beneficial for the poor should consider also whether other methods could achieve the same objectives. This article discusses agroecological approaches, and specifically the system of rice intensification (SRI), which is showing that it can meet food production needs of the poor relatively quickly, simply, cost-effectively and in an environmentally-benign manner. SRI is raising yields 30-100 per cent without requiring new seeds, chemical fertilisers or agrochemicals, while using less water. Agroecological approaches are meant to obtain maximum performance from the genetic potential of agricultural plants; there is no contradiction in combining agro-ecological and biotechnological approaches to improve performance in the field. This article does not propose that agroecological approaches should substitute for transgenic methods, but does suggest that opportunities in the agroecological domain are probably being overlooked in the current preoccupation with genocentric strategies.
Related content


ON BECOMING DISABLED AND ARTICULATING ALTERNATIVES
By Moser Ingunn
Cultural Studies , Vol. 19, Iss. 6, 2005-11 ,pp. :


In Search of Alternatives: Pro-Poor Entrepreneurship in Community Forestry
Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 48, Iss. 11, 2012-11 ,pp. :


The Multitude in
Rethinking Marxism, Vol. 13, Iss. 3-4, 2001-09 ,pp. :


Can NGOs Make a Difference: The Challenge of Development Alternatives
Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 44, Iss. 5, 2008-05 ,pp. :


Cultural Studies , Vol. 18, Iss. 1, 2004-01 ,pp. :