Tradition and innovation: Europe's accumulated executive order

ISSN： 0140-2382

Source： West European Politics, Vol.31, Iss.4, 2008-07, pp. : 639-661

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

With the advent of the European Union and its predecessors, Europe's executive order has become qualitatively different from the intergovernmental order inherited from the past. We ascribe this phenomenon in particular to the consolidation of the European Commission as a new and distinctive executive centre at the European level. This institutional innovation triggers significant centrifugal forces within national governments due to the Commission's strategy of establishing direct partnerships with semi-independent national agencies that are crucial for the implementation as well as the formulation of EU policies. The new order does not replace former orders; instead it tends to be layered around already existing orders so that the result is an increasingly compound and accumulated executive order. Such an order raises sensitive questions about which actors should be held to account: holding governments to account may no longer be enough and may need to be complemented with mechanisms and forums that focus both on the accountability of supranational executive bodies as well as national agencies with dual loyalties.