What works, and why it is important: A response to logan and gaes

ISSN： 0741-8825

Source： Justice Quarterly, Vol.11, Iss.4, 1994-12, pp. : 711-723

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The Transferability of Evaluation and the “What Works” Approach in France

By Roche Sebastian

European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, Vol. 11, Iss. 3-4, 2005-12 ,pp. : 297-320

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Why Courts Make Orders (And What This Tells us About Damages)

By Smith Stephen

Current Legal Problems, Vol. 64, Iss. 1, 2011-11 ,pp. : 51-87

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND RESPONSIBILITY-SHARING TO PROTECT REFUGEES: WHAT, WHY AND HOW?

International & Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 66, Iss. 4, 2017-08 ,pp. : 863-892

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Why America Still Needs the Jury Trial: A Friendly Response to Professor Dzur

By Burns Robert

Criminal Law and Philosophy, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 2011-01 ,pp. : 93-95

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

What to Make of Jus Post Bellum: A Response to Antonia Chayes

By Verdirame Guglielmo

European Journal of International Law, Vol. 24, Iss. 1, 2013-02 ,pp. : 307-313

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite