Jurors' comprehension of sentencing instructions: A test of the death penalty process in Tennessee*

Author： Blankenship Michael   Luginbuhl James   Cullen Francis   Redick William  

Publisher： Routledge Ltd

ISSN： 0741-8825

Source： Justice Quarterly, Vol.14, Iss.2, 1997-06, pp. : 325-351

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The Use of Religion in Death Penalty Sentencing Trials

By Miller Monica   Bornstein Brian  

Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 30, Iss. 6, 2006-12 ,pp. : 675-684

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Getting to the Point: Attempting to Improve Juror Comprehension of Capital Penalty Phase Instructions

By Smith Amy  

Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 35, Iss. 5, 2011-10 ,pp. : 339-350

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Death Penalty Decisions: Instruction Comprehension, Attitudes, and Decision Mediators

By Patry Marc W.  

Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, Vol. 13, Iss. 3, 2013-05 ,pp. : 204-244

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The influence of knowledge on reasons for death penalty opinions: An experimental test

By Bohm Robert   Clark Louise   Aveni Adrian  

Justice Quarterly, Vol. 7, Iss. 1, 1990-03 ,pp. : 175-188

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reform of the Sentencing Process

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 29, Iss. 2, 1971-11 ,pp. : 237-257

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite