

Author: Fourali Chahid
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1359-6748
Source: Research in Post-Compulsory Education, Vol.2, Iss.2, 1997-07, pp. : 121-150
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
This paper tackles the problem of knowledge specification in vocational awards. More particularly, it addresses this issue in the light of the United Kingdom (UK) experience, through the recent work of the National Council for Vocational Qualifications (NCVQ). Based on the short history of NCVQ, it traces the origins of some of the current knowledge specification and related knowledge assessment problems back to the pre-NCVQ era. The paper also highlights the controversy between competence and capability, and identifies two broad perspectives on the problem of competence specification: one, a behaviouristic perspective which primarily targets observable skills; the other, a cognitive/constructivist perspective which aims to identify the knowledge and understanding that underpins observable performance. The paper argues that a balanced view is both possible and necessary if valid and reliable standards of competence and associated assessment procedures are to be achieved. This argument is supported by suggestions, which build on recent views advanced in cognitive psychology, about on how to specify knowledge. The paper might be useful to those currently involved in similar initiatives around the world in understanding some of the factors that have influenced the setting of standards of competence.
Related content


The National Vocational Qualification Framework
Education + Training, Vol. 29, Iss. 4, 1993-12 ,pp. :




By Ryan Mike
Research in Post-Compulsory Education, Vol. 7, Iss. 2, 2002-07 ,pp. :


Identifying vocational education and training
By Moodie Gavin
Journal of Vocational Education and Training, Vol. 54, Iss. 2, 2002-06 ,pp. :