A qualitative investigation of mock-jurors' theories of emotion and reason

Author： Spackman Matthew P.   Belcher Jann C.   Cramer Lauren   Delton Yohan  

Publisher： Routledge Ltd

ISSN： 1464-0600

Source： Cognition and Emotion, Vol.20, Iss.5, 2006-08, pp. : 671-693

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Mock jurors' perceptions of identifications made by intoxicated eyewitnesses

By Evans Jacqueline Renee  

Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, 2010-02 ,pp. : 191-210

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The effects of mock jurors' beliefs about eyewitness performance on trial judgments

By Neal Tess M.S.  

Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 18, Iss. 1, 2012-01 ,pp. : 49-64

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The impact of different types of expert scientific testimony on mock jurors' liability verdicts

By Brian H. Bornstein  

Psychology, Crime and Law, Vol. 10, Iss. 4, 2004-12 ,pp. : 429-446

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Leadership style and personality of mock jurors and the effect on sentencing decisions

By Paul M. Valliant   PhD   Jennifer Loring  

Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, Vol. 26, Iss. 4, 1998-11 ,pp. : 421-424

Scientific Journal Publishers

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Knowledge-telling and knowledge-transforming arguments in mock jurors' verdict justifications

By Weinstock Michael  

Thinking & Reasoning, Vol. 17, Iss. 3, 2011-08 ,pp. : 282-314

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite