

Author: Aue Tatjana Hoeppli Marie-Eve
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1464-0600
Source: Cognition and Emotion, Vol.26, Iss.4, 2012-06, pp. : 727-736
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Whereas research has demonstrated that phobic or fearful individuals overestimate the likelihood of incurring aversive consequences from an encounter with feared stimuli, it has not yet been systematically investigated whether these individuals also overestimate the likelihood (i.e., the frequency) of such encounters. In the current study, spider-fearful and control participants were presented with background information that allowed them to estimate the overall likelihood that different kinds of animals (spiders, snakes, or birds) would be encountered. Spider-fearful participants systematically overestimated the likelihood of encountering a spider with respect to the likelihood of encountering a snake or a bird. No such expectancy bias was observed in control participants. The results thus strengthen our idea that there indeed exist two different types of expectancy bias in high fear and phobia that can be related to different components of the fear response. A conscientious distinction and examination of these two types of expectancy bias are of potential interest for therapeutic applications.
Related content


Sensitivity and response bias in fear of spiders
Cognition and Emotion, Vol. 18, Iss. 7, 2004-01 ,pp. :






Disgust and fear in response to spiders
By Vernon Laura L. Berenbaum Howard
Cognition and Emotion, Vol. 16, Iss. 6, 2002-11 ,pp. :


By Udy Catherine Newall Carol Broeren Suzanne Hudson Jennifer
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, Vol. 42, Iss. 3, 2014-04 ,pp. :