

Author: Foley Mary Ann Cowan Emily Schlemmer Emily Belser-Ehrlich Janna
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1464-0686
Source: Memory, Vol.20, Iss.4, 2012-05, pp. : 384-399
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
In the two experiments reported here the basis of the beneficial effects of generating images on false recognition errors is investigated. Acts of generating (descriptions, images, or both) were manipulated while examining the effects of the source of descriptions guiding imagery generations (participant vs peer). False recognition errors were relatively high across encoding conditions except when imagery generations were based on participants' own descriptions (Experiments 1 and 2). These differences in the acts of generating were not attributable to differences in the cohesiveness of descriptions themselves. Acts of generating led to greater “remember” responses than “know” responses only when participants were not the source of the descriptions used to generate images (Experiment 2). Results highlight the importance of examining the effects of the source of descriptions for guiding imagery (participant or peer) when testing predictions about the effects of imagery encoding on false recognition errors.
Related content








Encoding context and false recognition memories
By Bruce Darryl Phillips-Grant Kimberly Conrad Nicole Bona Susan
Memory, Vol. 12, Iss. 5, 2004-01 ,pp. :