

Author: Gregory Emma Landau Barbara McCloskey Michael
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1464-0716
Source: Visual Cognition, Vol.19, Iss.8, 2011-09, pp. : 1035-1062
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Although many cognitive functions require information about the orientations of objects, little is known about representation or processing of object orientation. Mirror-image confusion provides a potential clue. This phenomenon is typically characterized as a tendency to confuse images related by left–right reflection (reflection across an extrinsic vertical axis). However, in most previous studies the stimuli were inadequate for identifying a specific mirror-image (or other) relationship as the cause of the observed confusions. Using stimuli constructed to resolve this problem, Gregory and McCloskey (2010) found that adults’ errors were primarily reflections across an object axis, and not left–right reflections. The present study demonstrates that young children's orientation errors include both object–axis reflections and left–right reflections. We argue that children and adults represent object orientation in the same coordinate-system format (McCloskey, 2009), with orientation errors resulting from difficulty encoding or retaining one (adults) or two (children) specific components of the posited representations.
Related content


Mirror-image relations in category learning
By Rentschler Ingo Jüttner Martin
Visual Cognition, Vol. 15, Iss. 2, 2007-02 ,pp. :


By Walker Peter Gavin Bremner J. Smart Laura Pitt Tracy Apsey Denise
Memory, Vol. 16, Iss. 6, 2008-05 ,pp. :



