

Author: Barker Bernard
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1464-5106
Source: Journal of Education Policy, Vol.23, Iss.6, 2008-11, pp. : 669-683
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
There is growing concern that almost 20 years after the 1988 Education Act, top-down, large-scale reform has stalled. The policy mix of choice, competition, markets, regulation, accountability and leadership seems not to have closed the gap between advantaged and disadvantaged areas and individuals, while most variations in school performance can be explained in terms of intake differences. This paper reviews policy and progress since 1988 and assesses the extent to which central government has achieved its educational aims. Unacknowledged tensions and contradictions are identified in structures and practices that are supposed to constitute a reliable framework for sustainable improvement. The conclusion is drawn that since 1988 the national government apparatus has itself become an important obstacle to further progress. An independent review of policy-making and implementation is recommended so that schools and colleges are enabled to contribute more effectively to improvements in the quality of education.
Related content


Surviving, not Thriving: LEAs since the Education Reform Act of 1988
By Sharp Paul
Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 28, Iss. 2-3, 2002-06 ,pp. :








Absent from School: Educational Policy and Comprehensive Reform
The Urban Review, Vol. 34, Iss. 3, 2002-09 ,pp. :