Intellectual Merit and Broader Impact: The National Science Foundation's Broader Impacts Criterion and the Question of Peer Review

Author： Frodeman Robert   Parker Jonathan  

Publisher： Routledge Ltd

ISSN： 1464-5297

Source： Social Epistemology, Vol.23, Iss.3-4, 2009-07, pp. : 337-345

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Realizing Societal Benefit from Academic Research: Analysis of the National Science Foundation's Broader Impacts Criterion

By Roberts Melanie  

Social Epistemology, Vol. 23, Iss. 3-4, 2009-07 ,pp. : 199-219

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Why Diversity Matters: Understanding and Applying the Diversity Component of the National Science Foundation's Broader Impacts Criterion

By Intemann Kristen  

Social Epistemology, Vol. 23, Iss. 3-4, 2009-07 ,pp. : 249-266

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Role of the National Science Foundation Broader Impacts Criterion in Enhancing Research Ethics Pedagogy

By Schienke Erich   Tuana Nancy   Brown Donald   Davis Kenneth   Keller Klaus   Shortle James   Stickler Michelle   Baum Seth  

Social Epistemology, Vol. 23, Iss. 3-4, 2009-07 ,pp. : 317-336

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Implementation of the National Science Foundation's “Broader Impacts”: Efficiency Considerations and Alternative Approaches

By Burggren Warren  

Social Epistemology, Vol. 23, Iss. 3-4, 2009-07 ,pp. : 221-237

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Training the Next Generation of Scientists about Broader Impacts

By MacFadden Bruce  

Social Epistemology, Vol. 23, Iss. 3-4, 2009-07 ,pp. : 239-248

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite