Author: Rendle Matthew
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1465-3427
Source: Europe-Asia Studies, Vol.65, Iss.9, 2013-11, pp. : 1771-1788
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
After the October Revolution, the Bolsheviks established revolutionary tribunals to judge ‘counter-revolutionary’ and ‘political’ crimes. Amid conflicting reports from contemporaries on the effectiveness of these new courts, this essay examines their development over the first year of their existence. It argues that whilst tribunals were initially too inefficient for the regime, forcing greater central control over them, they played an important role in defining what constituted counter-revolution. In doing so, they promoted the regime's ideology, imparted an image of legality to the regime's actions, and helped the Bolsheviks to exert their control over a fragmented and diverse political landscape.
Related content
Political Theory and Community Building in Post-Soviet Russia
Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 64, Iss. 6, 2012-08 ,pp. :
Policing Economic Crime in Russia. From Soviet Planned Economy to Privatization
Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 64, Iss. 6, 2012-08 ,pp. :
Lone mothers in Russia: Soviet and Post-Soviet policy
Feminist Economics, Vol. 10, Iss. 2, 2004-07 ,pp. :