

Author: Kelegama Saman
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1465-4008
Source: The Round Table, Vol.94, Iss.381, 2005-09, pp. : 429-442
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Peace can generate an economic dividend, which can be further increased by appropriate economic reform. This dividend can in turn be used to raise popular support for conflict-resolution measures along the road to achieving a final political settlement, a strategy that characterizes the recent period in Sri Lanka. However, despite an increase in economic growth following the cessation of hostilities between the LTTE and the government, no substantial dividend has materialized for either government supporters in the South or LTTE supporters in the war-torn Northeast. The causes of this failure include delays in disbursing aid which would have eased adjustment to economic reforms—resulting in cuts to public spending that affected Southern households—and weak institutions that impeded the effective use of aid in the Northeast. The Sri Lankan experience highlights some important lessons for both government and donors on making use of an economic lever for consolidating a peace process and conflict resolution. It also highlights some of the dangers in relying too much on economic levers to consolidate a peace process when levels of mistrust are high.
Related content


Orienting Health Systems for Maternal Health – the Sri Lankan Experience
Development, Vol. 48, Iss. 4, 2005-12 ,pp. :


Peace education in conflict zones - experience from northern Sri Lanka
Journal of Peace Education, Vol. 5, Iss. 2, 2008-09 ,pp. :


Salvaging the fractured Sri Lankan peace process
Peace Review, Vol. 16, Iss. 2, 2004-06 ,pp. :




Feminists Transforming Economic Power
Development, Vol. 55, Iss. 3, 2012-09 ,pp. :