

Author: Heylen Kristof Haffner Marietta
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1466-1810
Source: Housing Studies, Vol.27, Iss.8, 2012-11, pp. : 1142-1161
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
This study explores the role of housing expenses and subsidies with respect to income distribution in Flanders (the northern part of Belgium) and the Netherlands in 2005–2006. It analyses income poverty and inequality by comparing equivalent disposable income before and after housing expenses with a relative poverty threshold and the Gini coefficient. Poverty and income inequality increase in both ‘countries’ when equivalent disposable income is corrected for housing expenses. Furthermore, the relative position of outright owners and social tenants regarding poverty improves. Housing subsidies play a (partly) different role in Flanders and the Netherlands. The implicit social rent subsidy in Flanders and the explicit housing allowance in the Netherlands serve the same goal; however, they both redistribute income relatively strongly in favour of low-income tenants. The tax relief system on the other hand increases income inequality in society, in both Flanders and the Netherlands, whereas our comparative analysis suggests that tax relief does not have a moderating effect on net housing expenses.
Related content


The distributional impact of housing subsidies in Flanders
European Journal of Housing Policy, Vol. 13, Iss. 1, 2013-03 ,pp. :






Housing Subsidies: Definitions and Comparisons
By Haffner Marietta E. A. Oxley Michael J.
Housing Studies, Vol. 14, Iss. 2, 1999-03 ,pp. :